Navigating Wisconsin State Income Tax Credit Incentives

September 14, 2011

By: Hamang B. Patel

A business executive can be excused for not knowing which of the various state income tax credit incentives is appropriate for his or her company. At first blush, the various tax incentives all seem to be similar. The following summarizes the various income tax incentives available to a company to expand operations in Wisconsin, and explains how a company would want to choose from among these programs.

Four Main Programs
There are four Wisconsin income tax incentives available to companies that seek to expand activities in Wisconsin, which are the following:

1.         Economic Development Tax Credits;

2.         Jobs Tax Credits;

3.         Relocation Tax Credits; and

4.         Enterprise Zone Tax Credits.

Many business owners are familiar with the Wisconsin Angel Investment Tax Credits (commonly known as “Act 255 Credits” after the statute creating the program several years ago) and the Early State Seed Investment Tax Credits. A key thing to remember is that these two investment tax credit programs provide tax credits to investors seeking to invest in a company, which is a good way to assist a company to raise capital from investors. However, these two programs don’t directly provide tax incentives to the company itself.

There are also other tax credit programs that are specific to certain industries (e.g. credits for dairy, meat processing, food processing, woody biomass, film production manufacturing, etc.). For the moment, let’s focus on the four major programs described above that can directly incentivize a company’s expansion plans without regard to industry type.

Economic Development Tax Credits
In 2009, Wisconsin (recognizing that simplicity is welcome in the business community) condensed five overlapping tax credit programs into the Economic Development Tax Credit program. This program provides a non-refundable state income tax credit for certain types of economic development projects. This program provides tax credits for companies that: (i) create jobs, (ii) invest in equipment or real estate, and/or (iii) train employees. For job creation, the credit ranges from $3,000 to $7,000 per job depending on the salary paid to the full-time employee. For capital investment, the credit can be up to 3% of the investment in equipment and 5% of the investment in real property. A credit for employee training is up to 50% of the training costs. These credits are typically less $3M per company, unless special approval is provided by the state. In 2011, the state increased the aggregate amount of tax credits that may be allocated to all applicants by $25M. Further information is available here.

Jobs Tax Credits
Available for the first time last year, Wisconsin provides a refundable state income tax credit specifically for creating jobs in Wisconsin pursuant to the Jobs Tax Credit program. The credits are up to 10% of new full-time employee wages. New jobs must pay annual wages of at least $20,000 ($30,000 depending on the classification of the county or city) but not more than $100,000. The total amount of these credits available to all applicants per year is $5M. Further information is available here .

Relocation Tax Credits
In 2011, Wisconsin created a new non-refundable state income tax credit known as the Relocation Tax Credits program. These credits are available for a company that moves at least 51% of its workforce payroll or at least $200,000 of wages to Wisconsin from another state or country. The credit equals the company’s total Wisconsin income tax liability (after taking into account all other credits, deductions and exclusions). The credit can be claimed for two consecutive years, beginning in the year the business relocates to Wisconsin.

Enterprise Zone Tax Credits
In 2011, Wisconsin expanded the Enterprise Zone Tax Credit program to allow up to 20 “zones” (up from the existing 12 zones). The zones are created at the discretion of the Wisconsin Economic Development Corporation (the “EDC”), taking into account the area’s economic need. Although not self-evident from the statutes, in practice a “zone” has been the area around a particular company’s facilities rather than a broad area. So in practice, this program should be thought of as an incentive for a particular company’s expansion plans. A company receiving these credits should make a significant investment in jobs and/or capital. Our discussions with EDC staff suggests that projects that would receive these credits are for those that create or retain 800-1,000 jobs in Wisconsin and/or invest $80M – $100M of capital investment. Several refundable state income tax credits are available under this program. For job creation or retention, the credit is up to 7% of wages in excess of $20,000 ($30,000 depending on the classification of the county or city). For job training, the credit is up to 100% of the training costs. For capital investment, the credit is up to 10% of expenditures. A final credit is equal to 1% of purchases of goods or services from Wisconsin suppliers.

Certification
To obtain any of the credits described above, a company needs to get certification from the EDC prior to starting the job creation or capital investment upon which the credits will be computed. Certification is a competitive process and depends on the allocation constraints of the EDC (i.e. how much of the limited credits remain available). Our experience with the EDC is that certification for a credit also depends on the quality of jobs created (i.e. whether the jobs are low-wage or transitory) and, for non-refundable credits, whether the company has taxable income to use such credits. The EDC has also told us that while there is no statutory prohibition against double dipping to obtain multiple credits, the EDC would never in practice certify a company to receive multiple credits for doing the same thing. For example, the EDC wouldn’t certify a company to receive the Jobs Credit and the Economic Development Credit for creating the same jobs. On the other hand, the EDC has told us that it might be possible for a company on a case by case basis to be certified, to get the Jobs Tax Credits for creating jobs and also to be certified to receive the Economic Development Tax Credits for other activities (e.g. capital investment or employee training).

Choosing Among Programs
The EDC will ultimately choose among the above described incentives that are available/offered to a company. Nonetheless, a company would need to know which incentive to push for. The following lists some of the factors that should be taken into consideration from the perspective of the company.

  1. Tax Appetite. The obvious difference among these programs is that the Jobs Tax Credit program and the Enterprise Zone Tax Credit program provide for refundable credits. Thus, if a company doesn’t have taxable Wisconsin income that can be offset by these credits, the state will literally send a check in the mail to the company for the unused portion. In contrast, the Economic Development Tax Credit program and the Relocation Tax Credit program offer non-refundable credits. If the company doesn’t have taxable Wisconsin income that can absorb the credit, it would have a preference for the Jobs Tax Credit or Enterprise Zone Tax Credit.
  2. Size of Project. Based on our discussions with EDC staff, the Enterprise Zone Tax Credits is not for small projects. Thus, unless a company is planning a major job creation or capital investment program, the company is unlikely to be certified to receive Enterprise Zone Tax Credits.
  3. Quality of Wages. For some programs, the level of wages for new jobs created must be above a certain threshold (e.g. Jobs Tax Credit and Enterprise Zone Tax Credit programs) due to statutory requirements. Unless the expected jobs exceed this threshold, such programs can be disregarded. For the Economic Development Tax Credit program, which allows tax credit solely due to capital investment activities, our experience is that if the jobs resulting from or saved by the capital investment are not well-paying jobs (e.g. migrant workers earning minimum wage), then the EDC is unlikely to certify the program for credits.

The economic value of these tax credit incentives can be powerful. A company considering a business expansion would be advised to spend some time evaluating the various state incentives and contacting the EDC to see if any of these incentives are available.


Recent Tax Bill Provides Incentives for Startup Community

January 6, 2011

By: Hamang B. Patel and Craig J. Johnson

Exclusion for Gains on Small Business Stock
Back in October, we wrote a blog post titled Incentive to Invest (Now!) in C-Corporation Startups summarizing an exciting provision of the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010 (“SBJA”) that was passed at the end of September. Well, the incentive is now to Invest (Soon!) in C-Corporation Startups due to a year-long extension by the recent tax bill signed into law on December 17, 2010 (the Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010, referred to herein as the “Bill”).

The tax incentive at issue allows gains from the sale of certain small business stock to be excluded from federal taxes. The exclusion traditionally applied to 50% of qualifying stock purchased by an eligible investor, but has been recently expanded to: (1) 75% of qualifying stock purchased in 2009 through September 26, 2010, by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, (2) 100% of qualifying stock purchased during the remainder of 2010 by the SBJA and (3) 100% of qualifying stock purchased through 2011 by the Bill. Some of the several qualifications include:

  • Investors that are corporations are not eligible for the incentive;
  • The stock must be that of a C-Corporation and purchased at original issuance from the company or an underwriter;
  • The company’s aggregate gross assets cannot exceed $50 million prior to or immediately following the issuance; and
  • The stock must be held for more than five years.

While a provision for completely tax-free gains was exciting on its face, the SBJA only made it available for qualifying purchases made within a very narrow window. In practice, we expected this to serve more as a windfall to investors who were already planning to make an investment, rather than encouragement for investors sitting on the sideline.

However, the Bill extended the 100% exemption for purchases made between September 27, 2010 and December 31, 2011, hopefully creating a welcome stimulus in the investment and startup community.

Extension of Individual Tax Rates
Most of the focus on the Bill related to the extension of current tax rates for individuals, which includes the investor-friendly reduced maximum tax rates of 15% on capital gains and dividends.

Retroactive Extension of Tax Credits
The Bill also retroactively extended a couple of important tax credit programs that had expired at the end of 2009. The Research Credit, or R&D Credit, offers a business tax credit equal to a percentage of qualifying research expenditures and has been extended by the Bill through 2011. In addition, the New Markets Tax Credits program offers business tax incentives in designated geographic areas and has been allocated an additional $3.5 billion for each of 2010 and 2011, whereas the previous allocations ended with $5 billion in 2009.


Free Money Isn’t Free (Except When It Is)

November 18, 2010

By: Hamang B. Patel

For many high growth technology companies, a state or federal grant is a blessing. It can help fund R&D, clinical trials, or otherwise provide the capital needed to expand. The casual observer could hardly be faulted for thinking that if, for example, the National Institutes of Health wanted to give a company a grant, that the IRS wouldn’t tax the grant. That would be absurd, right? After all, why would one hand of the government want to take back cash that the other hand just offered? The truth is complicated, and exasperating. Government grants are in fact taxable depending on how the money is used, and how the recipient chooses to do business (i.e. LLC vs. Corp).

Here’s how the tax rules work. The general IRS rule is that all income (regardless of the source) is taxable. However, there is a major exception to this general rule. In 1954, the federal income tax laws were amended so that corporations (including S-corporations) could receive government grants tax-free – if certain conditions are met. Some of the key conditions for a grant to be tax-free include the following:

  1. the government money can’t be compensation for goods or services;
  2. the government money must be invested in depreciable property (e.g. equipment) rather than spent on payroll;
  3. the government money must be used to generate income (i.e. invested in the business rather than paid as a dividend).

Notably, the 1954 law didn’t cover grants received by LLCs or partnerships. This omission isn’t believed to be because of a federal bias against LLCs and partnerships. Rather, in 1954, the concept of LLCs and limited partnerships had not yet been created, and Congress probably thought that nobody in their right mind would do business (other than a mom and pop store) using a general partnership. Back then, corporations were essentially the only game in town. So Congress could be excused back then for not including LLCs and partnerships in the scope of this rule.

In the half century since, Congress never got around to clarifying the tax treatment of grants made to LLCs or partnerships. In the absence of any guidance from the IRS, most tax advisers assumed that LLCs and partnerships could rely on ancient Supreme Court law from the 1930s saying that grants are always tax-free.

The IRS recently broke its self-imposed veil of silence on this issue, and issued a memo to its auditors arguing that grants made to LLCs and partnerships are taxable. Many tax advisers responded to the IRS memo with a collective “They can’t really mean that, right?” In fact, in the last few years, the IRS has followed with a flurry of additional memos essentially saying “Oh yes, we really meant it.” Not wanting to pick a fight with the IRS, most tax advisers have now done a 180-degree turn and are advising that grants to LLCs and partnerships are taxable.

For the company that is expecting a government grant, the new IRS position may play a major factor in choosing between organizing as an LLC or corporation. As noted above, S-corporations (even though taxed as a passthrough) get the same ability to receive grants tax-free as C-corporations. But before an LLC expecting a grant rushes to convert to a corporation, it would be wise to examine how the upcoming grant would be used. Keep in mind that grants used to pay payroll or to pay independent contractors are always taxable, regardless of whether the grantee is a corporation. And also keep in mind that LLCs and partnerships have other tax benefits. So organizing as a corporation isn’t always the solution. Of course, there is always the hope that Congress will change the law and treat LLCs and partnerships the same as corporations in this regard – but don’t hold your breath.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 40 other followers