$400 Million in New Venture Capital Money

May 27, 2011

By: Melissa M. Turczyn

On Thursday, May 5th, legislation was revealed by its main sponsors, Sen. Randy Hopper and Rep. Gary Tauchen, which would aid the venture capital community in Wisconsin. The “Wisconsin Jobs Act,” is a bill that would create two new complementary funds in Wisconsin – the Jobs Now Fund and the Badger Jobs Fund. The two funds combined would total up to $400 million.

The Jobs Now Fund would be a rapid-response fund, which would issue $200 million in tax credits over time to certain insurance companies that made investments in certified capital funds. The actual tax credits would be for 80% of the value of the investments made. In other words, the $200 million in tax credits could potentially attract up to $250 million in investments. The credits would not be able to be claimed for a minimum of five years, thereby insuring that the money would be invested long before the credits would be paid.

The Badger Jobs Fund, on the other hand, would be a longer term program. This fund would operate as a “fund of funds,” meaning it would invest up to $200 million in qualified venture capital funds. The money would come from the placement of bonds, which would be supported by investment returns, the growth of aggregate state tax collections from the companies financed by such venture capital funds, and contingent tax credits. Each qualified venture capital fund would be limited to no more than 15% of the entire pool of funds. Additionally, for each $1 a VC fund received from the Fund, it would need to raise at least $3 on its own.

The bill also contains certain governance provisions, criteria for eligible companies and investors and accountability standards.

It is estimated that some thirty other states have already enacted programs similar to the proposed Wisconsin Jobs Act. Given the success Wisconsin has had with its Act 255 Tax Credits, it appears we are fashionably late to the party in further developing the infrastructure necessary to help our home-grown high-growth companies.


I Knew the Dot Com Bubble ….

May 26, 2011

By: Paul A. Jones

… and this isn’t it.

Seriously, one hot company (LinkedIn) doubles in price on IPO day, several dozen venture backed companies have gone public as May draws to a close, and the Chicken Littles of the investing world are issuing Bubble Warnings. Hello. I was around for the real Bubble. It happened after a year where not one but well over 100 hot companies at least doubled their price on IPO day. It was a year when almost 550 companies went public. It was a year where “business” models were denominated in eyeballs, not dollars. And it was an event where entire markets crashed, not a collection of highfliers.

I confess, I do not get LinkedIn’s valuation. And I expect that, over the coming months, there are going to be some more things I don’t understand. But so far, at least, these are things that (i) I don’t understand but can at least imagine without blushing; and (ii) are pretty well confined to a rather narrow sector of the market. As to my imagination, if you don’t see the difference between a LinkedIn and, say, a Boo.com or Pets.com, well, try harder. As to the breadth of the rally cum bubble, back then it was not just all of the Dotcom world but pretty much all of the tech world. Today, the “what are they smoking” valuations are pretty much limited to the social network sector (though there are, of course, some high fliers like Apple in a few other sectors).

In short, my guess is some people are going to get burned by some of today’s hot deals. But I’ll be surprised if there are any mass cremations.


Patent Rights and Attracting Investors

May 25, 2011

By: Ivan T. Kirchev

It is very important for startups, entrepreneurs, and small companies to protect their intellectual property rights. Creating a patent portfolio (or even several pending patent applications) will improve the company’s ability to attract venture capital financing. Typically, investors are faced with different uncertainties when they evaluate a startup and they often rely on patents (or pending patent applications) as indicators for calculating the company’s potential. For that reason, startups, entrepreneurs, and small companies have to understand not only the patent application process, but the patent assignment processes as well.

Correctly assigning the patent rights of an invention to the company should be as important for a startup as is filing patent applications or acquiring patents for its core technology or business model. A patent assignment is a transfer or sale of the entire interest in a patent. In other words, all rights that were originally granted to the patentee will transfer to the assignee. Generally, patent assignments can be made during the application process, or after a patent issues. It is recommended that patent applications be immediately assigned from the inventor(s) to the company so that the company can control the prosecution of the application and can add the patent (when issued) to its portfolio. Although recording an assignment with the USPTO is not required, recordation can protect against confusion as to the true owner of the patent.

A company’s patent portfolio is crucial to its ability to attract investors, and therefore a company should make sure that all patent rights are properly documented and assigned to the company. Before investing in a startup or a small company, investors typically conduct due diligence to investigate ownership, chain of title, product marking practices, maintenance fees, and litigation issues relating to the company’s patents. Startups, entrepreneurs, and small companies should be aware of some ownership issues related to their patent rights. There are several issues that can impact a company’s ownership of patent rights:

  • Incorrectly drafted employment contracts. Generally, employment contract bind an employee to assign all inventions and discoveries within the scope of employment to the company. However, some employment contracts fail to include such provision.
  • Absence of employment contracts, and rights of co-inventors. In the absence of an employment contract or an agreement with each inventor addressing the assignment of an invention, each co-inventor or prior assignee retains the right to practice, and perhaps assign, the invention without compensating or even notifying the other co-inventors or assignees.
  • Rights of former employers. Many startups are founded by former employees of other, typically larger companies. If this is the case, the prior employment contracts of the founders and inventors of patents and applications should be examined for provisions that allow a former employer to assert rights in the company’s IP or provisions that limit the former employee’s ability to compete in its technology and market areas.
  • Rights of universities. Because many startups are based on technology that is first developed by professors or graduate students, agreements between universities and inventors of that technology should be studied to ensure that a university cannot assert rights in the company’s IP.
  • Rights of the government. A company funded by the government should be aware that the government might retain rights in a patented invention resulting from the government support.
  • Rights of spouses. When a company is owned by both spouses, it is very important to decide and understand who owns the majority shares of the company and, therefore, rights to the company’s IP. For example, if the spouses get divorced the person who owns more shares of the company’s stock can ultimately receive ownership rights of the patents and the entire company.

In summary, potential investors not only evaluate the intellectual property assets of a startup (e.g. patents, etc.), but they also examine the assignments of the patent rights of these companies to ensure that the core technologies of these startups are protected with patents correctly assigned to the companies. An entrepreneur or a startup company should accordingly be aware of the importance of intellectual property rights protection and proper assignment of these rights.


Mary Turke and Melissa Turczyn Talk with Jody Patrick and Joan Gillman of In Business Radio

May 24, 2011

Mary Turke and Melissa Turczyn recently sat down with Jody Patrick and Joan Gillman of In Business radio, to discuss Michael Best’s Venture Capital practice and our Women’s Summit, an initiative for women entrepreneurs.

The show aired Thursday, May 19, 2011 on WTDY 1670 AM in Madison, WI.

Click here to listen to Mary and Melissa on In Business radio with Jody & Joan.


Does Your Company Really Own Their Own Intellectual Property?

May 11, 2011

By: Jeffrey D. Peterson

Oftentimes, a new company’s most valuable assets are their intangible ones, namely, their intellectual property. It is in leveraging this intellectual property, whether to gain market share, attract investment, etc., that often times can make or break a new venture. An often critical error made as a new business grows and adds new employees and works more with collaborative partners and contractors, is that the intellectual property which the company often believes it still owns can get actual start to “drift” from the company with ownership rights starting to vest with such new employees, partners and contractors.

Common assumptions that new business often have is that “My company paid for the work and so it owns the IP rights” or “I have an NDA with my contractor and so my company owns the rights” or “anything my employee creates for me is owned by the company.” All of these assumptions can be fatally incorrect, and can lead to a loss of ownership interest in intellectual property that is created for the company. What adds to this confusion is that different laws and rules apply for different forms of intellectual property.

For instance, under copyright law, if an employee creates an original work of authorship within their duties and scope of employment, the ownership of the copyright automatically vests in the company. However, if an independent contractor creates an original work of authorship for a company, such as a logo, software application, etc. the copyright would automatically vest in the author of the work, namely, the independent contractor. Thus any independent contractor that does work for a company would own any copyrights that they would created for the company, apart from any physical deliverable they may provide to the company, absent a specific agreement that the work be assigned to the company or be a work “made for hire” (applicable only under limited circumstances).

With respect to patent rights, all patent rights are personal. The rights in a patent rest independently with the inventor of the patent, who must be named on the patent applications by law. Therefore, individual employees and independent contractors which create patentable material will own the patents outright absent a contractual agreement with the company to transfer such patent rights to the company in exchange for the company either employing them or paying them to create a deliverable on which the patent is based.

Any trade secrets a company has, if maintained by their employees as confidential, will be maintained by the company as a trade secret. However, any independent contractors that the company works with which bring trade secrets to the company may potentially still belong to the independent contractor unless specifically transferred to the company. Additionally, potential trade secret protection for the company can be lost if no reasonable means of protection are taken to keep such information secret when working with an independent contractor. Such a reasonable form of protection would be to use a confidential agreement with the independent contractor,

It is critical that a company manage its relationships with its employees and independent contractors such to maintain and control ownership of its intellectual property. For instance, all employees that the company hires should sign an agreement that any intellectual property that they create in the course of their employment with the company, is owned by the company. The employee should also agree sign any subsequent legal documents necessary to perfect such assignments to the company. Likewise, when a company works with an independent contractor, such as a web designer, graphic designer, software vendor, etc., the company should make it explicitly clear by contract that they either own any intellectual property rights embedded in the work being done for them, or at least secure from the independent contract a license to utilize such intellectual property rights without having to pay additional monies to the independent contractor down the road.

The bottom line is, if your company is paying for the work, it should make sure that it owns the IP rights embedded in such work by using a formal written contract, either with the company’s employees or with any third party contactors.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 41 other followers